Our council booked the Governance Intensive two weeks before a major treasury vote. Helena walked us through quorum scenarios we had not modelled. The vote passed with 34% participation — low, but above our revised threshold. Without the session we would have failed quorum again.
— James L., treasury council, Bristol-based NFT collective
The delegate clinic was shorter than I expected, which was fine — Marcus focused on my vote documentation template rather than generic advice. I would have liked more time on conflict disclosure, but the follow-up email answered that question thoroughly.
— Anika R., independent delegate, Leeds
We ran a Proposal Lab for our grants committee. Four hours felt rushed for twelve people, honestly. Still, we left with a forum-ready draft and a red-team list that saved us embarrassment when someone spotted a beneficiary conflict during the forum phase.
— David Chen, grants working group lead, remote team (UK/EU)
Focus Panel Hub does not sell you ongoing consulting. That was refreshing. They facilitated, sent notes, and stepped back. Our team implemented the operating rhythm ourselves over the following month.
— Sarah Okonkwo, protocol operations, Cardiff

Case note: Redesigning delegate accountability

A mid-size Solana protocol approached us in March 2025 after three consecutive votes failed despite majority support — all due to quorum. Their delegate programme had grown quickly, but communication standards varied widely.

We ran a two-day engagement: day one was a Governance Intensive with six council members; day two was a Proposal Lab to draft a delegate charter amendment. The group identified that delegates were not required to publish pre-vote rationale, so delegators could not distinguish active delegates from passive vote-weight holders.

The charter amendment passed six weeks later with 41% participation — the highest turnout in eight months. Council attributed the increase partly to the clearer delegate requirements, though they noted that a concurrent product launch also drove engagement. Governance fixes alone do not solve participation; they remove unnecessary friction.

Learn about the Governance Intensive